Howard Stern’s $83 million Bonus

I have tremendous respect for The Financial Times.  It is a great newspaper and I am privileged to write for it on occasion.  But when I see FT write “Sirius Satellite Radio is paying “shock jock” Howard Stern an $83m bonus despite a 50 per cent (their spelling not mine) share price fall since he joined…

Howard Sterns _83 million Bonus

I have tremendous respect for The Financial Times.  It is a great newspaper and I am privileged to write for it on occasion.  But when I see FT write “Sirius Satellite Radio is paying “shock jock” Howard Stern an $83m bonus despite a 50 per cent (their spelling not mine) share price fall since he joined the fledging media group,” I get frustrated. I am frustrated not because of Howard Stern’s compensation, but because of a serious failure by the media to separate individual operating performance from the performance of the stock.

Howard Stern’s job was to bring subscriber growth. In fact, FT writes Stern’s “bonus was made on incentives tied to Sirius’s subscriber growth.”  He did what he was hired to do – bring subscribers. Be it a CEO (Bob Nardelli comes to mind here) or a “shock jock,” Howard Stern should be compensated on what he can control – stock price is not one of those metrics.  Tying Howard’s compensation to the performance of Sirius stock is not much different from tying his compensation to General Motors’ car sales – he has no control over it whatsoever. Howard Stern is a smart cookie, he is the most highly paid entertainer in the world after all, and thus he tied his compensation to something he could control – subscribers.

I wrote this article Howard Stern’s $500 million Sirius deal a bit more than two years ago, enjoy!

Please read the following important disclosure here.

Enjoyed this read?

Share it with someone who’d love it too!

New to investing?

Explore these valuable guides to get started.

Related Articles

Buffett and the Berkshire Paradox

Warren Buffett and the Berkshire Hathaway Paradox

Trip to Omaha has everything and nothing to do with Warren Buffett. The main event that draws everyone to Omaha – the Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) annual meeting – is actually the least important part.
Redefine “value” in this era of the US stock market

Redefine “value” in this era of the US stock market

Do we need to redefine “value” in this era of the US stock market, or should we continue to sit on the sidelines if traditional metrics show equities to be overvalued?

A Brief Rant on Tesla & Musk

Last week, I received a lot of responses to my article about Tesla. They ranged from “Stop spewing your anti-right propaganda and stick to data” to “You don’t like Tesla stock. Are you saying your next car won’t be a Tesla?”
Current thoughts on Tesla (TSLA)

Current thoughts on Tesla

Tesla market value of $780 billion mostly reflects Elon's future dreams, not car sales. The reality? Only $100-180 billion tied to the actual vehicle business.

Leave a Comment