Future Looks Bright for Computer Associates

January 28, 2004 – TheStreet.com: Street Insight I’m satisfied with CA’s performance in the latest quarter; plus, its organic growth numbers look good. I love companies with recurring revenues — they have less operational volatility and usually have to do less to grow. CA has an attractive valuation, an improved corporate and financial profile —…

January 28, 2004 – TheStreet.com: Street Insight

  • I’m satisfied with CA’s performance in the latest quarter; plus, its organic growth numbers look good.
  • I love companies with recurring revenues — they have less operational volatility and usually have to do less to grow.
  • CA has an attractive valuation, an improved corporate and financial profile — and, likely, a brighter future.

I received several emails asking if my views on Computer Associates (CA) have changed. I believe CA at $27 is more attractive than it was at $29 or $30. I am satisfied with CA’s performance in the latest quarter — its revenues and cash flows showed solid growth. (Remember that the EPS number is meaningless since it doesn’t depict economics of the business; my understanding is that the stock is trading on operating or free cash flows).

Organic Growth Numbers Look Good
CA’s organic growth numbers look good. CA reported 8% growth in revenues; however, the weakening dollar and the Netegrity acquisition contributed 5% to sales growth. Thus, year-over-year organic growth was 3%. In addition, last year CA changed the way it recognizes revenues in its channel business, so last year’s results had more up-front revenues. After adjusting for that, organic growth in revenue in constant currency was 6%. I am not looking for excuses to bump CA revenues higher, however, in my analysis I always look for core operational results that would help me to predict future performance.

Subscription revenues are up to 68% of sales from 60% last year. A larger portion of subscription revenues make CA’s overall revenues and operating performance more predictable. I love companies that have recurring revenues since they have less operational volatility and usually have to do a lot less to grow their businesses.

Plenty of Growth Lies Ahead
The balance sheet has never looked better. CA issued $1 billion of long-term debt and will use the proceeds to pay off a bond that is maturing in April 2005. The company ended the quarter with no net debt and a net cash position of $28 million (debt minus cash).

Recent acquisitions are a success and integration is on track. The Netegrity acquisition was closed 45 days ahead of schedule. PestPatrol will give CA valuable experience selling software to retail customer through traditional retail channels or online. Interestingly, CA expects PestPatrol to generate $10 million in annual profits. CA only paid $39 million for the company, so that’s a very nice return on investment.

There is plenty of growth ahead. CA expects to grow revenue in mid-to-high single digits — I believe those numbers are achievable in the long run. Cash flows should grow at a faster pace due to significant operational leverage that the software business brings.

Retail Channel Will Be Important Driver
CA is expanding sales to new uncharted geographical areas (i.e. the Middle East). In addition, other geographic areas such as China, Asia-Pacific and Japan showed nice growth in the quarter.
I believe the retail channel will become a very important driver of future growth, as some (not all) of the CA products are a perfect fit for the retail channel. Also, though the mainframe business is perceived as a no-growth business, the latest IBM numbers showed that mainframe business is up and kicking, thus there is plenty of growth left in mainframes for CA.

I believe acquisitions will become a very important part of the CA growth strategy; however, I don’t expect CA to make acquisitions of enormous proportions. Netegrity and PestPatrol are good examples of the types of acquisitions we will see in the future — small and strategic.

Given CA’s attractive valuation, lack of huge stock options expense, much-improved corporate and financial profile and a fairly predictable and brighter future, I am still a buyer of CA stock. (not a recomendation)

Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA

Copyright TheStreet.com 2005

Please read the following important disclosure here.

Related Articles

Why I No Longer Mind Losing an Argument

Why I No Longer Mind Losing an Argument

Reflecting on my experience with Dale Carnegie's book, I share how it transformed my approach to criticism and debate, and why I no longer mind losing an argument.

How do I get any research done since I travel a lot?

I get asked at times: How do I get any research done since I travel a lot? To answer this question, I need to explain how we do research.
The Growing Pains of Maturity

The Growing Pains of Maturity

Many times, we bought because they were in their “junior year”; this is what made them undervalued. Our research led us to the conclusion that their difficulties were transitory and that as they matured the market would revalue them.
What is the Value of Apple? How do we evaluate risk?

What is the Value of Apple? How do we evaluate risk?

Today I will share the Q&A section of the letter. Every time I am almost finished with the client letter, I ask clients to send me any questions they have about their portfolio or other topics. I answer these questions in the Q&A section.

Leave a Comment